Abilene Reporter News: Local News

NEWS
Local
  » Around the Big Country
» Calendar
» Columns
» Inside-Abilene
» YourPlaceInSpace
» YourBigCountry
State
Nation / World
Business
Education
Military
News Quiz
Obituaries
Political
Weather

 Reporter-News Archives


 

Sunday, May 14, 2000

Stage set for Hubbard water battle
By Samuel Segrist
Reporter-News Staff Writer

The cities that take water from Hubbard Creek Reservoir — Abilene included — are negotiating to determine how much water each can pump from the shrinking lake over the next five years.

City officials from the four communities are working with the West Central Texas Municipal Water District, which manages Hubbard, to reach an agreement by June 30.

The result will have direct consequences on how much water the Key City can draw from the Stephens County reservoir, which has supplied almost all of Abilene’s water this year.

Even as the lake’s supply dwindles, David Bell, the water district’s president, said the negotiations should end well.

“I don’t think anyone’s totally out of kilter,” Bell said.

Even so, figuring out how to supply water to four cities, each with its own set of concerns, is not a simple task. Complicating it is the near-record drought that has caused Abilene to ratchet up the amount of water it traditionally takes from Hubbard.

Through a recent agreement, which legally ends June 30, the Abilene water department can pump 30 million gallons a day from the reservoir through its two pipelines. The amount is almost double the 15.5 million gallons Abilene is supposed to average per day under its contract with the water district.

The city managers of the other towns connected to Hubbard — Albany, Anson and Breckenridge — have not said Abilene is taking too much. However, while the average Abilenian may believe the city is doing much to conserve water, such as limiting lawn sprinkling to once every two weeks, the city managers are not as sure.

“We fully realize that Abilene cannot live on 15.5 million gallons a day from Hubbard,” said Gary Earnest, city manager of Breckenridge. “We also feel like there’s a need for a little more of a concentrated effort to educate the public. The citizens need to realize that the contracted amount is 15.5 million.”

The contracts guiding the dispersal of Hubbard water go back to the lake’s creation after the drought of the 1950s. The West Central Texas Municipal Water District has contracts with each of the four member cities that helped build the lake. The contracts are the same, save for the amount of water each city can take.

Abilene’s contract was last amended after the drought of the early ‘80s, when the city built a second pipeline to the reservoir to increase the capacity it could pump from it.

The numbers guiding how much Abilene can take is more complicated than a simple daily limit of 15.5 million gallons.

After the lake was built and filled, engineers determined that 23,000 acre-feet of water could be safely pumped out per year. An acre-foot is the amount of water needed to cover one square acre to a 12-inch depth.

Abilene, by far the largest member city, gets 73 percent of the yield. Breckenridge gets 10 percent, Anson can take up to 9 percent and Albany can pump 8 percent, Bell said. That translates to Abilene being able to take an average of 15.5 million gallons a day.

But the city does not have to adhere strictly to an average.

Essentially, each city has a bank account with the water district. They start with a definite amount of water, and they can make withdrawals depending on their needs until they’ve taken what they’re entitled to each year.

Abilene has been able to draw more than its share of water because of the amended agreement and because it did not pump from Hubbard on days when Lake Fort Phantom Hill, the city’s main water supply, could adequately meet the city’s needs.

But the drought is putting pressure on the water district to re-work the contracts.

One of the biggest possible changes involves the amount of time included in the contracts. Bell said an engineering study recommended that the timeframe used to set the standard on how much water the cities can pump should be changed from one year to five years.

That would allow Abilene to draw from Hubbard exclusively in times such as these, when a drought-shrunken Phantom is being protected as an emergency supply. The excess could be made up after the drought when Abilene doesn’t need Hubbard’s water.

In times of plentiful rainfall, Abilene has gone months without pumping from Hubbard.

Engineers have also discovered another 4,000 acre-feet can be drawn safely from the reservoir, giving each city a 17 percent increase.

Some of the other cities, which have not overdrawn their water supply, are cautious about changing the contracts. Bell said the difference is in points of view.

“The smaller cities take a smaller share of the water, and therefore haven’t had to make restrictions,” he said. “Abilene is in a state where it needs that water now.”

Once the contracts are written, the documents must be approved by the water district’s board, which consists of 12 members — six from Abilene and two from each of the other cities. After that, the four city councils must approve the changes.

Several members of the Abilene City Council are concerned about the city’s image with the other member cities.

Comments by Abilene City Manager Roy McDaniel last week that the city could go several more years without a pipeline to the O.H. Ivie Reservoir raised a few eyebrows on the council, which has directed city administrators to make the pipeline a top priority.

Council members Rob Beckham and Kay Alexander said the remarks surprised them.

“My concern gets into how we are perceived in Abilene,” Beckham said. “I think the smaller cities in the municipal water district need to understand that we are working diligently towards resolving our water issues.”

McDaniel said he will act as directed. As to the Hubbard contract, he said he preferred not to comment on negotiations.

Bell said he is hopeful the new contracts can be ready by the end of this month. The most important thing for cities to concentrate on, he said, is not the maximum amount a city can take at one time, but the average that can be taken over a five-year period.

In other words, don’t worry about 30 million gallons a day, worry about the amount taken over five years.

“The real discussion is, ‘What are these averages?’” Bell said. “I’m comfortable that there will be a good compromise answer.”

Contact city government writer Samuel Segrist at 676-6744 or segrists@abinews.com.

Send a Letter to the Editor about This Story

 texnews.com

Reporter OnLine

Local News

Texas News

Copyright ©2000, Abilene Reporter-News / Texnews / E.W. Scripps Publications

 

ReporterNewsHomes ReporterNewsCars ReporterNewsJobs ReporterNewsClassifieds BigCountryDining GoFridayNight Marketplace

© 1995- The E.W. Scripps Co. and the Abilene Reporter-News.
All Rights Reserved.
Site users are subject to our User Agreement. We also have a Privacy Policy.