Abilene Reporter News: Local News

NEWS
Local
  » Around the Big Country
» Calendar
» Columns
» Inside-Abilene
» YourPlaceInSpace
» YourBigCountry
State
Nation / World
Business
Education
Military
News Quiz
Obituaries
Political
Weather

 Reporter-News Archives


Thursday, July 19, 2001

Amendment would give group time to protect Dyess interests

By Tara Copp
Reporter-News Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON - An amendment barring the use of 2001 defense funds to relocate the B-1 bomber fleet before Oct. 1 would "buy some time" for Dyess Air Force Base advocates to strategize on how to protect the base's interests, they say.

The amendment's language, offered by Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., was incorporated into the Senate's 2001 supplemental spending bill, which passed 98-1 last week. The bill still must win final approval from the U.S. House and Senate, and then from President Bush, after consideration by a conference committee of House members and senators.

Roberts' office does not expect any opposition.

Prohibiting the spending of 2001 money to move B-1s would effectively keep all 93 planes from being relocated until at least Oct. 1, the beginning of the 2002 budget year.

The B-1 is assigned to five air force bases: Dyess, Ellsworth in South Dakota, McConnell in Kansas, Mountain Home in Idaho, and Robins in Georgia. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has proposed reducing the fleet to 60 planes and consolidating them at Dyess and Ellsworth.

Dyess' fleet would decrease from 40 planes to 32.

"The amendment at least buys us some time," said former Dyess commander Bill Ehrie, who traveled to Washington on Tuesday to discuss the B-1 and other Abilene-related issues. "… But the amendment is only effective through Sept. 30 of this year. What happens beyond that, we don't know."

Frank Puckett, chairman of Abilene's Military Affairs Committee, said Dyess advocates will use the time to sort out details of the Air Force's plan to determine the ultimate impact.

"The Abilene community is disappointed with the Department of Defense and the Air Force's opposition on B-1s," he said. "As recently as a few months ago, we were told the B-1 is the backbone of the bomber fleet and that it will continue to be. We are not sure if that is the intention of the Air Force or not now.

"What we'd like to see is the details of this plan roll out to the point that we can see and understand that that is in fact going to continue to be the case.''

Rumsfeld has said that cutting the fleet by 33 planes would save $1.5 billion over five years, which would be used to upgrade the remaining planes. Puckett welcomes that possibility.

"If … that makes the B-1 a more viable weapons system," he said, "then we'll go along with the program.

"Right now, we're counting very heavily on Hutchison, Stenholm and Gramm to take the forefront on these issues," he added, referring to Texas Sens. Kay Bailey Hutchison and Phil Gramm and U.S. Rep. Charles Stenholm, D-Abilene.

Contact Washington bureau writer Tara Copp at coppt@shns.com

Send a Letter to the Editor about This Story

Start or Join A Discussion about This Story

Send the URL (Address) of This Story to A Friend:

Enter their email address below:

texnews

reporternews

local news

features

Copyright ©2001, Abilene Reporter-News / Texnews / E.W. Scripps. Publications

 

ReporterNewsHomes ReporterNewsCars ReporterNewsJobs ReporterNewsClassifieds BigCountryDining GoFridayNight Marketplace

© 1995- The E.W. Scripps Co. and the Abilene Reporter-News.
All Rights Reserved.
Site users are subject to our User Agreement. We also have a Privacy Policy.