Abilene Reporter News: Local News

NEWS
Local
  » Around the Big Country
» Calendar
» Columns
» Inside-Abilene
» YourPlaceInSpace
» YourBigCountry
State
Nation / World
Business
Education
Military
News Quiz
Obituaries
Political
Weather

 Reporter-News Archives


Tuesday, July 17, 2001

Rumsfeld defends B-1 cuts, closings
From staff and wire reports

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, facing resistance from lawmakers protecting local military programs, argued Monday for slashing the B-1 bomber force and closing bases to save money.

“We’re going to come at you,” Rumsfeld told lawmakers, saying a failure to reduce Cold War-era bombers and close bases would “send a damaging signal” as the military seeks savings. “We have simply got to turn waste into weapons.”

One way to save money, he said, is reducing the size of the B-1 force, arguing that the planes are 20 years old, not stealthy, in-tended for a Cold War the nation is no longer fighting and “not viable in a conflict today: They are too vulnerable.”

His plan to reduce the force from 93 planes to 60, upgrade those remaining and close three of the five B-1 bases reflects “the kind of efficiency we owe the taxpayers,” he said. Dyess Air Force Base would be one of the two bases that would maintain a fleet of B-1B Lancers, though the number of supersonic aircraft at the base would drop from 40 to 32.

Ellsworth AFB in South Dakota would also continue to fly B-1s under Rumsfeld’s plan.

Lawmakers from Kansas, Georgia and Idaho have loudly protested the loss of B-1 bases in their states.

Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., whose state risks losing nine B-1s at McConnell AFB, and Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, whose Mountain Home AFB has seven B-1s, have offered an amendment to the 2001 defense appropriations that prohibits 2001 B-1 funding from being used to relocate the fleet before Oct. 1, the start of the new fiscal year.

“A decision of this magnitude should not have been made without the advice and consent of Congress,” Craig said. “This amendment corrects that by giving Congress time to thoroughly review such a major proposal in the regular budget process over the coming weeks.”

Rumsfeld warned that a delay would harm the military.

“Failure of this proposal will send a damaging message across the defense establishment — that finding ways to save money and increase efficiency is a waste of time and leads to nothing but hostility to the Air Force,” he said.

Appearing before the House Appropriations Committee’s defense panel, the defense secretary emphasized the bottom line, saying the proposed B-1 cuts will save up to $1.5 billion over five years. Those funds will pay for the modernization of the remaining planes, he said.

For the same cost-saving reasons, he called for another round of base closings, saying, “As little stomach as I have for it, we’re going to come at you.”

“I sure wish that members of Congress would offer up bases rather than me having go find them,” Rumsfeld said later.

“I’ve already given you three,” replied Rep. Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., the subcommittee chairman.

Members of the House Appropriations Committee’s defense panel offered much support for the proposed defense budget of $328.9 billion for fiscal 2002, an increase of $22.8 billion over current spending.

Despite his acknowledgment that the Pentagon needs $347 billion next year to keep up with current costs plus inflation, Rumsfeld bridled at criticism that President Bush had let him down. The proposed budget, he said, “only makes a good dent in the shortfall we’re facing.”

Rep. Norman Dicks, D-Wash., encouraged Rumsfeld “to tell the American people ... what we need to have.”

“We’re told you asked for like $38 billion,” but got only $18 billion, he said, referring to the administration’s late June increase in its original $310 billion Defense Department spending request.

Rumsfeld rejected the invitation to blame his boss.

“The country has known that we’ve been under-funding the defense budget year after year after year,” he said. “This is nothing new. ... There is no way on the face of the earth we’re going to dig out of the hole we’re in in one year. It will take a series of years.”

The Associated Press and Reporter-News Washington bureau writer Tara Copp contributed to this report.

Send a Letter to the Editor about This Story

Start or Join A Discussion about This Story

Send the URL (Address) of This Story to A Friend:

Enter their email address below:

texnews

reporternews

local news

features

Copyright ©2001, Abilene Reporter-News / Texnews / E.W. Scripps. Publications

 

ReporterNewsHomes ReporterNewsCars ReporterNewsJobs ReporterNewsClassifieds BigCountryDining GoFridayNight Marketplace

© 1995- The E.W. Scripps Co. and the Abilene Reporter-News.
All Rights Reserved.
Site users are subject to our User Agreement. We also have a Privacy Policy.