THIS PAGE | E-MAIL THIS PAGE
Wednesday, September 18, 2002
Judge dismisses lingering beef lawsuit against Oprah Winfrey
news and business lines
By MARK BABINECK
Associated Press Writer
After six years, escalating legal fees and a celebrated trial in the heart of Texas cattle country, a
federal judge has dismissed a lingering lawsuit accusing Oprah Winfrey of maligning the beef industry.
U.S. District Judge Mary Lou Robinson threw out "all claims and causes of action asserted or that
could have been asserted" by Cactus Feeding Club Inc. and against Winfrey, her production company
and vegetarian activist Howard Lyman.
The lawsuit, filed in April 1998, was similar to another suit filed two years earlier that went to trial in
Robinson's court in January 1998. The first suit caused Winfrey to move her popular talk show to
Amarillo for several episodes during the trial, creating a carnival-like atmosphere in the Texas
Panhandle city for six weeks.
After Winfrey won at trial, 138 livestock owners sued her again in Dumas, a town of 13,000 about 45
miles north of Amarillo. But the case was quickly moved back to Robinson's federal court, over the
objections of plaintiff's attorney Kevin Isern, and has sat there for four years.
"It was kind of a soft landing to a hard trial," said Chip Babcock, a top-gun First Amendment attorney
who represented Winfrey in the case.
Cattlemen contended in both suits that Lyman violated Texas' "veggie libel" law during an April 1996
edition of "The Oprah Winfrey Show" by saying U.S. beef could be at risk of spreading mad cow
The incurable illness, blamed for several human deaths in England, had not been detected in U.S.
herds before the show or in the 6 1/2 years since.
Plaintiffs also accused Winfrey's show of editing the program to portray the beef industry negatively
and complained her vow never to eat another hamburger also damaged potential sales.
In the weeks after the show, already slumping cattle prices dropped to 10-year lows. Cactus Feeders
Inc. owner Paul Engler, who was behind both lawsuits, unsuccessfully appealed the verdict to the 5th
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Babcock said his side expects to recover $85,000 in court costs, but otherwise Robinson ruled each
side must cover its own expenses in her order dated Aug. 27.
Neither Engler nor Winfrey immediately returned messages seeking comment Tuesday.
The Amarillo trial sparked a media encampment outside the federal courthouse and long lines of
residents wanting to get into the courtroom and the local theater where Winfrey did several of her
Winfrey testified, defending the show and its right to have guests speak their minds. Lyman, a former
rancher who became an animal rights advocate, stood by his statements on the witness stand.
Winfrey attended the courtroom every day, then taped shows in the evenings. When the trial ended,
she told a jubilant crowd on the courthouse steps, "Free speech rocks!"
The legal morass was estimated to have cost Winfrey as much as $1 million, with the cattlemen
spending perhaps hundreds of thousands of dollars themselves.
the URL (Address) of This Story to A Friend: