|
PRINT
THIS PAGE | E-MAIL THIS PAGE
Tuesday, July 14, 1998
Report: Texas Tech allowed receiver to play
despite NCAA information
HOUSTON - Texas Tech allowed a receiver to play after learning
of an NCAA memorandum suggesting he was improperly readmitted
to the university in 1995, according to newly released documents
examined by the Houston Chronicle.
Texas Tech knew about an NCAA memo written by a senior official
in the membership services department weeks before the Red Raiders
played their Dec. 29, 1996, Alamo Bowl game, the newspaper reported
in Monday's editions.
However, the Lubbock school allowed junior Malcolm McKenzie
to play, and McKenzie continued playing last season, catching
42 passes for 462 yards and two touchdowns.
His eligibility is among several possible rules violations
under review by the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions,
which heard the Texas Tech case last April in Cleveland. School
officials expect a decision to be announced by month's end.
The school already has imposed three years' probation on its
athletic program, including substantial scholarship cuts in six
sports. The NCAA committee could add to Tech's punishment.
Texas Tech Chancellor John T. Montford said school officials
didn't believe they were bound to react to the memo because it
was not an official rules interpretation and because the university
thought it was doing nothing wrong.
"I can tell you there may have been wrong decisions made
at the time, but I believe they were good-faith decisions based
on evidence and advice of counsel," Montford said. "I
don't think there was any flagrant disregard of a memo or anything
like that."
The memo was part of a case summary prepared by the NCAA enforcement
staff prior to the hearing. It was released June 23 to reporters
who have been requesting it under the Texas Open Records Act for
the previous two months.
The McKenzie situation was one of several allegations submitted
by the NCAA to Texas Tech in an official letter of inquiry last
October. The letter accused the school of widespread mistakes
in 18 areas.
Rampant errors in academic certification and financial aid
distribution uncovered by an internal audit accounted for two
of the 18 matters covered in the NCAA letter. Texas Tech agreed
with many of the allegations in a response made public April 14,
but disputed the charges related to McKenzie.
McKenzie, suspended for academic reasons in the spring of 1995,
was readmitted because he made an A in American History during
a San Antonio College summer school course. McKenzie only earned
a B, but a San Antonio College professor agreed to raise the grade
if he did extra-credit work during the fall.
McKenzie needed the A for readmission to Tech.
When McKenzie didn't complete the assignment, Thomas M. Settles,
the San Antonio College professor, sent a letter to the Texas
Tech registrar's office in December 1995 complaining he'd been
"conned" by McKenzie and Tech coaches who promised to
help the player do the extra-credit project.
The NCAA contends McKenzie received special treatment for his
athletic status and that Texas Tech failed to act when confronted
with evidence of possible infractions.
Send a Letter to the Editor about This
Story | Start or Join A Discussion about This Story
Send the URL (Address)
of This Story to A Friend:
|