Friday, October 31, 1997
Izzard opposes 'fast-track' trade legislation
By RICHARD HORN / Abilene Reporter-News
Republican congressional hopeful Rudy Izzard said Thursday
he opposes "fast-track" trade legislation now being
debated in Washington.
"Certainly I'm not opposed to global trade," Izzard
said. "But when it comes to negotiating our trade agreements,
I believe it's much better for Congress and the president to work
out problems beforehand rather than hastily enact these trade
agreements and then try to repair them later."
Izzard challenged incumbent Democrat Charles Stenholm in 1996
and plans to run again next year. He said numerous people, especially
farmers and ranchers, have asked about his position on the trade
issue.
Under fast-track authority, President Clinton could negotiate
trade deals without fear Congress would pick them apart. Senators
and representatives could vote only to approve or disapprove trade
pacts; they could not amend them.
The proposed legislation has drawn opposition from trade unions,
liberal Democrats and some conservative Republicans. Stenholm,
the top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, came out
early in favor of fast track, calling it "absolutely necessary
to the future of our industry."
Several farm organizations also are pushing for fast-track
approval.
But Izzard said he's heard from many individual farmers who
oppose granting Clinton that authority.
"In all fairness to Congressman Stenholm, as ranking minority
member (of the committee) he is probably looking at it with a
little broader view," Izzard said. "I feel my position
more accurately represents people in the 17th District."
Fast-track proponents argue that without the authority, other
countries will be reluctant to reach agreement with the United
States, leaving the nation out of the picture and therefore at
a critical trade disadvantage.
But Izzard said he doesn't believe the United States will be
protectionist or isolationist if Congress doesn't grant fast-track
authority to the president.
"The entire world looks to the United States to set the
pace for global trade, and that pace needs to be measured and
fair," he said.
Izzard said he would favor alternative legislation that would
limit amendments but still give Congress more than a single up-or-down
vote on a pact.
Send a Letter to the Editor about This
Story | Start or Join A Discussion about This Story
Send the URL (Address) of This Story
to A Friend:
Copyright ©1997,
Abilene Reporter-News / Texnews / E.W. Scripps Publications
|