Friday, October 31, 1997
Giving China rope to hang us with
By Linda Chavez
Jiang Zemin knows what he wants out of this week's visit to
the United States: respect, legitimacy and the lifting of a 12-year-old
ban on the transfer of U.S. nuclear technology to China. And President
Clinton has promised to deliver all three.
But what is not clear is what the United States gets in return.
The Sino-American relationship to date has been decidedly one-sided,
with China getting most of what it wants -- trade, investment,
technology -- and the U.S. getting little except a huge $40 billion
trade deficit, no improvement in China's human rights record and
promises that Beijing may honor its treaty obligations.
So why is the world's only superpower kowtowing to one of the
world's last remaining Communist dictatorships? Good old-fashioned
capitalist pressure, that's why.
American businesses see China as a huge, new potential market
for everything from Fords to french fries. With 1.2 billion people,
China is more populous than most of the rest of the industrialized
nations combined. And because China's economy has more than quadrupled
in the last three decades, at the fastest rate of growth in the
world, companies here believe the Chinese will soon be able to
afford to buy our products.
Several corporate heads attended the White House state dinner
Wednesday, cementing their already cozy relationships with China's
rulers, and today, Jiang visits the New York Stock Exchange and
dines again with corporate scions.
As the Washington Times recently reported, dozens of deals
between Beijing and American companies were announced just days
before Jiang landed in Honolulu. Aetna won the right to sell insurance
in China. Atlantic Richfield Co. expanded its $1 billion investment
in China by signing a new agreement with the state-owned China
National Offshore Oil Corp. to develop three natural-gas fields
in the South China Sea. Boeing Co. expects to receive a Chinese
commitment for $1.5 billion in new aircraft during Jiang's visit.
Ford Motor signed a pact to build 150,000 cars and 60,000 vans
in China, an agreement it reached only after conceding that it
will give its technology to the state-owned Jiangling Motors Corp.
as part of the deal. General Motors will sell $200 million in
new car kits to its Chinese joint-venture partners over the next
two years, bringing to $1.6 billion its exports to China.
In all, China made commitments for some $4 billion in U.S.
goods or joint ventures.
But despite the obvious benefit to bottom-line profits for
American corporations, these deals are often far less favorable
to American business interests -- much less national interests
-- than they might seem. While China apologists in the United
States often claim that these joint ventures and investments are
proof that China has abandoned its socialist heritage in favor
of free-market capitalism, the truth is far more complicated.
Many of these ventures involve Chinese companies that are state-owned
or state-controlled, hardly an example of Adam Smith's "invisible
hand." Without a proper legal system to protect U.S. business
interests, it is unclear that these American investments will
turn out to be as safe as outside investors hope.
But whatever the danger to U.S. businesses, the real problem
in the one-sided relationship Jiang is promoting on his trip here
this week is that it may harm American security interests. For
years, China has been a major exporter of missiles and nuclear
technology to countries hostile to the United States, including
Iran and North Korea, despite treaty obligations that are supposed
to prohibit such transfers. Now, based on a weak promise that
it won't sell Iran any more cruise missiles or transfer dangerous
nuclear and chemical weapons technology to the rogue nation, China
has received a commitment that it will receive U.S. civilian nuclear
technology that has been restricted by law from getting for more
than a decade. (Iran is so cash poor right now, it probably can't
afford to buy what China's selling anyway.)
Congress could still block the deal by a two-thirds vote, but
don't bet on it. China's interests are likely to be promoted through
the halls of Congress by American business lobbyists eager to
secure new contracts.
Lenin always said that we capitalists would happily sell Communists
the rope with which to hang us. China may yet prove him right.
Creators Syndicate, Inc.
Send a Letter to the Editor about This
Article | Start or Join A Discussion about This Article
Send the URL (Address) of This Article to A Friend:
Copyright ©1997,
Abilene Reporter-News / Texnews / E.W. Scripps Publications
|