Wednesday, December 24, 1997
Good alternatives to racial preferences
By Linda Chavez
Last week, President Clinton invited me and a handful of others
to meet with him in the Oval Office to discuss race. Among the
participants were Ward Connerly, who led the fight to abolish
racial preferences in California, and Stephan and Abigail Thernstrom,
authors of the highly acclaimed new book, America in Black and
White: One Nation Indivisible.
Most of us were there because we've been lifelong critics of
racial preference programs and believe the president has not lived
up to his promise to "mend affirmative action."
But the president had some criticism for us, too, faulting
conservatives for not coming up with alternatives to racial preferences.
I anticipated the president's criticism and came armed with
some specific examples of programs that I believe are far better
than the current system of set-asides and racial preferences.
I oppose racial preferences not only because I think they're unfair
-- and, when mandated by government, unconstitutional -- but also
because they don't achieve their intended purpose of helping blacks
and Hispanics.
The real challenge for all of us is to improve skills and equal
opportunity in this society -- and most affirmative-action programs
do a miserable job of both. College admissions programs aimed
at minorities are a notorious example of good intentions gone
awry. Many, if not most, schools admit black and Hispanic students
who can't meet normal university requirements.
Then, they do little or nothing to insure these poorly prepared
students will actually succeed. Ironically, many of the minority
students who do benefit from such programs come from middle-class
or affluent backgrounds.
There are a handful of institutions around the country that
do it differently, however. I told the president about a program
at the University of Maryland, for example, which is open to students
of all races who are the first in their families to attend college.
The school provides a special summer orientation session in which
students learn study skills, take special writing and math courses,
and receive academic counseling. Students who successfully complete
the session take a highly structured freshman curriculum.
Even after their first year, students continue to receive support
services, including tutoring, counseling and help in selecting
their course schedules and making career choices. Georgia Tech
has had a similar program in place for several years.
I also gave the president information about a career ladder
program run by the United Federation of Teachers in New York,
which has provided opportunity to thousands of teachers' aides
to earn college degrees and become teachers themselves. The program
isn't targeted by race or ethnicity, but the greatest number of
beneficiaries have been black or Hispanic.
The same is true of a program operated by the Associated General
Contractors to help small contractors. Although the program is
open to small contractors of all races, minority firms are often
the ones most in need of the assistance the AGC provides.
The program helps small contractors in qualifying for surety
bonds, financing and insurance. Such strategies are far more likely
to help small contractors succeed than bidding preferences or
set-asides could ever be.
What's more, the AGC program isn't subject to the fraud and
abuse that has plagued government minority set-aside programs
for decades.
Success in any business requires providing a superior product
at a low price. But government set-aside programs create a rarefied
environment in which participating minority businesses don't have
to offer the lowest bid. In some instances, they don't even have
to compete with other firms.
This is hardly the way the real business world operates, which
is why so many minority businesses that depend on government set-asides
fail when they are no longer eligible to participate in the program.
Even the president acknowledged the problem during our meeting.
Clinton said he wants to "stop talking past each other
and start working together." He has taken a first step by
listening to his critics. Let's see if he'll take the next one.
Improving skills and equality of opportunity -- not racial
double standards -- are the real keys to black and Hispanic advancement.
But so long as government itself is in the business of awarding
benefits on the basis of skin color, we'll never become a truly
color-blind society.
Creators Syndicate, Inc.
Send a Letter to the Editor about This
Article | Start or Join A Discussion about This Article
Send the URL (Address) of This Article to A Friend:
Copyright ©1997,
Abilene Reporter-News / Texnews / E.W. Scripps Publications
|